Rutgers vs. Illinois Preview and a Bit of a Bye-Week Roundup
![]() |
scarletknights.com |
After two-weeks to work on fundamentals, get a bit
healthier, and prepare for Saturday's showdown with the University
of Illinois Fighting Illini , Rutgers finally gets the chance to go back to showing the
improvement that we saw at the start of the season. Coach Ash said that the
staff "took a hard look at all three phases." The Scarlet Knights
head into the contest at Memorial Stadium in Champaign to face what appears to be the most
beatable opponent on the remaining schedule.
Saying the Illini are beatable and then going to their home
field and doing that are two different things. Like Rutgers ,
the Fighting Illini have recently been embroiled in a quarterback controversy.
Sophomore Jeff George, Jr., just wrested the job from junior Chayce Crouch.
George gives the Illini a QB with a very strong arm who can sling the ball
downfield, much like his father. However, in the small sample of his play, he's
also been prone to interceptions, having thrown five of them this year to his
one touchdown.
Normally, Rutgers would
salivate at this matchup, but the RU defensive backfield is still in flux.
During his weekly press conference this past Monday, head coach Chris Ash gave
us the good and bad. The good news was that safety Kiy Hester has been cleared
to play. The bad news is that Saquan Hampton is out for the game, and could
possibly miss significantly more time. K.J. Gray will start opposite Hester.
Converted receiver Rashad Blunt continued to practice at safety over the bye
week, and we also learned that last year's leading receiver, Jawuan Harris, was
also moved to safety. It remains to be seen how many reps Harris and Blunt will
be asked to play, but you would have to think that it limits the defensive
calls somewhat, having two guys who just moved to the position among the
back-up plans. In the past two weeks, the coaches have mentioned Zane Campbell
and Lawrence Stevens as two of the guys who are also seeing reps at safety.
Meanwhile, Kobe Marfo, Zane Campbell, and Edwin Lopez remain
on the two deep as options to play nickel and back up starting safeties Isaiah
Wharton and Damon Hayes, with Blessuan Austin lost for the season.
Coach Ash has also given us some good and bad news regarding
the depth chart on offense. Top playmaker Janarion Grant is cleared to play
after having dealt with lingering concussion symptoms the past few weeks.
Starting center Jonah Jackson, though, had surgery and will miss significant
time. Fortunately, freshman Mike Maietti has emerged as a capable replacement
for Jackson as
the starting center. Still, having Jackson
out certainly limits the experienced depth on the line.
The biggest pressing question about the offense is whether
there will be a change at quarterback. In the Ohio State
debacle, the RU offense was unable to complete a single pass to a wide
receiver, only to backs and tight ends. It's tough to win that way because it
means you are probably not getting the ball downfield and spreading out and
stretching the defense. The result being that it makes running the ball all the
more difficult. There were reports early in the week that Giovanni Rescigno was
getting more reps in practice, but neither Ash or offensive coordinator Jerry
Kill have divulged publicly who the starter will be as of this writing. Coach
Kill did say that if either Johnathan Lewis or Rescigno were to unseat Kyle
Bolin it "would not radically change the offense." As a young
quarterback, Lewis is improving in the areas of "route reading and the
progression," but the physical tools are there. Even if Lewis doesn't get
the start, I think with an additional two weeks of practice, he'll have an
expanded package put in place for him. I'm excited to see what Rutgers tries to do at first on offense, whether they
will immediately try to spread the field, or whether they will instead try to
establish the run. Going on the road, I would tend to prefer trying to take a
shot or two early to try to make a big play and take the crowd out of the game.
Comments