Rutgers vs. Iowa Takeaways

I've had a few days to recover from and digest the Rutgers 14-7 loss to the Iowa Hawkeyes. I correctly picked Rutgers to cover the 13.5 point spread, but I certainly didn't anticipate how close the game would actually be and that Rutgers, in my opinion, should have won the game.

Before I get into breaking down what I thought were suspect decisions, I want to take a moment to express my well wishes to Janarion Grant and Quanzell Lambert, after both sustained season-ending injuries in the game. They will both be missed and were having excellent seasons to this point. Chris Ash mentioned in his Monday press conference that Rutgers will petition the NCAA for another year of eligibility for both men. Let's hope we see them back on the banks. But if not, thank you for everything!

Despite having the team well-prepared, I believe this loss was on the coaches. Rutgers came up empty on three of the four trips to the red zone. On the first trip, Chris Laviano back pedaled on third down, taking a backbreaking sack to pull the team out of field goal range. That one was on him for not getting rid of the ball. Getting three there would've certainly helped, but it wasn't what unsaddled the Knights.

The other two trips to the red zone should've resulted in field goals. Had the trip at the end of the first half resulted in a field goal rather than a turnover on downs who knows how the game would've turned out. We don't know if Iowa would've still marched down for a score at the end of the half. My main issue with going for it on 4th down was that a chip-shop field goal would've given RU the lead in a game where the defense had been very good. And I always feel that when you have an opportunity to take the lead, you take the lead, regardless of other factors. Not only did Rutgers not take the lead, they gave Iowa the momentum.

Still, I was a little surprised at the play calling on first and second down. If they were going to take Laviano out of the game to call keepers in a goal-line situation I would've like to have seen Giovanni Rescigno in the game rather than Tylin Oden. Don't get me wrong, Oden is a dynamic runner. But on Rescigno's one carry against Howard he carried guys on his back for five yards before bulldozing into the end zone. It seems he would've had the most muscle in a short-yardage situation. Or, I would've like to have seen Robert Martin or Josh Hicks get carries there. Both guys, have a little more "ass behind them," to borrow a phrase from Drew Mehringer. Then, on the fourth down play, they have Laviano run the pitch option, a play that I'm sure both Zach Allen and Tylin Oden have more experience executing based on their offensive systems in high school.

Speaking of Mehringer's comments that Oden "didn't have the ass behind him" to get through the line; it would've been even crazier if his ass was in front of him, no? I kid.

Mehringer also said the loss "definitely stings" and made him want to "vomit." But there were some positives on offense. Aside from the sack he took on the first drive, Chris Laviano played a solid game. Head Coach Chris Ash, "thought Chris did a nice job today." He didn't turn the ball over, passed for more yardage than Iowa quarterback C.J. Beathard, and Rutgers converted a higher percentage of third downs than did Iowa. Rutgers also had more first downs than Iowa and equaled the Hawkeyes total for rushing yards.

Other things of note on offense are that Robert Martin had his 2nd straight 100-yard game and Andrew Patton had his 3rd consecutive game with a touchdown reception. Let's hope both players keep it going against Ohio State on Saturday.

Jay Niemann was happy that his defense held Iowa to 3 of 11 on third-down conversions. And you can see the defense was pumped and flying. Despite giving up some big runs, it's an accomplishment for them to have held Iowa to 14 points, with one of the touchdowns coming after Patton's alleged turnover gave the Hawkeyes a short field.

Speaking of Patton's fumble, when I first saw the play I thought that the Iowa defender got some of Patton's face mask as they were fighting for the ball. I looking at the replay more closely, I was probably off base on that. But I'm still not sure Patton ever had possession if you consider that the defender's had was in there the entire time. Not sure how Patton could've ever possessed the ball if the defender's hand is also touching the ball the entire time.

Getting back to the defense, Kiy Hester seemingly had his name called during the broadcast after every defensive play. He ended up finishing with 11 tackles and 2 pass break-ups. Hester now leads the team with 26 tackles. Deonte Roberts was another defensive player who stood out, gathering a career-high 9 tackles in the contest.

Charles Snorweah got on the field for Rutgers. He is the 16th Rutgers player to see their first game action in the first four games this year. Getting all of these new guys some action certainly helps build depth as the year goes on, not only giving guys a taste in case they get their names called again this year, but building for next year when everyone will be more used to the offensive and defensive systems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rutgers vs. Nebraska Preview: September 23, 2017

Rutgers Season Hype Video

Rutgers Media Day Ash Press Conference Highlights